The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sector's contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
The given pie charts indicate how the percentages of industry sectors was contributed to the economy of Turkey in the years 2000 and 2016.
Looking at the changes, construction account for the lowest percentage of the total contribution with 3 % in 2000 and the figure demonstrated over three-fold increase to one –tenth in 2016. As the next tiny proportion of Turkey income “ Finance, Business and other” and “ Manufacturing” registered with 5% and 8% respectively during the period of 2000 and this figure rose significantly to 8% and 12% in 2016. Furthermore, there was mentionable increase in the percentage of “ Trade , Utilities and Transportation” from 14% to 16% in the given periods.
By contrast, the most significant sector was “ Agriculture” showing almost quarter of total contribution with 24% and the ratio presented noticeable decrease by 10% between 2000 and 2016. In 2000, “ Government” and “Leisure and Hospitality” were 12% and 17% , after 16 years the figure were 9% and 14% respectively. “Healthcare and Education” remain stable, being 17% in both given years.
Overall, the smallest proportions of the contribution grew while the largest ones represented decreases in the given periods in Turkey.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e charts indicate how the percentages of industry sectors was contributed to the ...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... figure rose significantly to 8% and 12% in 2016. Furthermore, there was mentiona...
^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...crease in the percentage of ' Trade , Utilities and Transportation' from...
^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tio presented noticeable decrease by 10% between 2000 and 2016. In 2000, ' G...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e and Hospitality' were 12% and 17% , after 16 years the figure were 9% and 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62244897959 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.71040113586 2.65546596893 140% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586734693878 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9805513528 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226094222431 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129062844326 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159634718153 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204513030839 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188660818465 0.0819641961636 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.