Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying in their career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often said that the individuals who established their permanent working career in early age are provided further satisfaction in their work compared to the employers regularly altering their workplace. However, I believe that the people who tend to change their position have multiple opportunities in the organizations in terms of financial support and facilities.
The most obvious advantage belongs to the people who prefer to change frequently their work to others, they are affordable to earn much more money depending on their work. Admittedly, the main purpose of working is to achieve huge amount of money rather than to build future career. By receiving higher salary, there is natural contentment for their jobs. Thus, unless the financial state of people is adequately in the workplace, they are not satisfied their works regardless how many years they work in these place.
Furthermore, in contemporary society, current people crave to work in the places which have variety of facilities and conditions. For this reason, most employees try to find themselves in comfortable workplace than old ones in order to experience feelings of satisfaction. Further opportunities such as transportation, healthcare, travel and others which are provided by companies led people to satisfy their employers. It would seem that job hoppers can obtain exaltation in working.
Taking everything into consideration, some support the view about people making an early choice of permanent career in order to take pleasant on their work, from my standpoint, they should change their jobs according to their requirement for entertainment and salary in the workplaces.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46124031008 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00871328439 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6251574916 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.090909091 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245984481225 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918375098928 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526321303843 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154402557858 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336836897381 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.