Working professionals were asked to fill up a questionnaire with the questions related to why they pursue education. The first chart shows these factors while second represents their opinions about who should contribute towards the course fees. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Working Professional were asked to fill up a questionnaire related to why they pursue education. The first chart shows these factors while the second represents their opinions about who should contribute towards the course fees.
In first stage, considering reasons for pursuing education the major reasons is to create a good CV in which 50 percent of professional fall under this category. Next category which is current qualification not enough in which approximately 37.5 percent. The learning never stops and Improve International job prospects in which 20 percent professional fill up questionnaire for this category. The remaining category to interact with like-minded people, can change job easily and increase productivity fall in 8 percent to 22 percent.
In further stage, considering who should contribute towards the course fee the two category company/organization and Individual carry approximately same percent which is 35 percent and 40 percent. Next which tax payer contributed one fourth percent of overall contribution which is 25 percent.
In conclusion, professional who give major questionnaire which is to create a good CV and two contributors who contributed equal percent are company/organization and individual.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74594594595 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51382119235 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0966918352 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305628632703 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156176139864 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176449691303 0.0843802449381 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265885646532 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.296173335515 0.0819641961636 361% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.