You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts below provide the primary reason tourists visited Orange City in two different years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate which activities became more popular between 2006-2016 in tourist who visited Orange City.
Overall, the number of tourist increased from 1 million into 1.9 million in a decade.
The principal reason that tourists visited the city in 2006 was the annual events with 45% of preferences. By 2016, this type of activity decreased in 13% points but still continued as one of the favourites in second position. The second choice for tourism in 2006 was museums, which significant declined by 2016, they passed from 27% of choices to 11%, positioning in third place.
However, the primary reason had changed over the years. For 2016, the restaurants were on the top of the chart, showing an abruptly jump up from 10% to 41%. Meanwhile, the other types of events presented a little variation of grow, passing to the final of the chart in 2006 to the fourth place in 2016.
Finally, the theater never had been popular, also it went down 5 points of percentage by 2016.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('abruptly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('jump') instead of another adjective.
...s were on the top of the chart, showing an abruptly jump up from 10% to 41%. Meanwhile, the othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8875739645 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50650217073 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662721893491 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3305009478 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107930807279 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503103417185 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476875652211 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560791668326 0.15604864568 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374756602239 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.