The charts below show each grade level s activity and the total revenue gained from it by percentage from King Primary School s recent fundraising event Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele

Essay topics:

The charts below show each grade level’s activity and the total revenue gained from it, by percentage, from King Primary School’s recent fundraising event.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table associates each of the activities held at the recent fundraiser in King's Primary School with the index from 1 to 6. Each of these grade level activity is then used to show the percentage earnings done by them during the fundraiser, which are color coded in the above chart.

By comparing grades in both chart and table, it can clearly be inferred that out of the gross revenue earned during the fundraiser, the dance contest has earned the highest money. Also, the book sale held in the fundraiser churned out the overall least amount of money.

All the fundraising activities are divided into contest and sales of unique items. If you look at it closely, various activities held in the fundraiser i.e. Dance, Cake Decorating and Soccer Skill contest collected more than sixty percent of the entire revenue for the event. Out of these events, the dance event has earned maximum amount of money, followed by cake decorating contest with soccer skill contest earning the least of out the three.

Also, different sales held in the event i.e. Book, Art and Cookie sales was just shy of forty percent of the entire revenue in the event, thereby drawing less money than different events. Out of these events, cookie sales were able to generate most amount of money, with art sale in the middle and book sale at the end of the three sales.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75319148936 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22858502592 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527659574468 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5182336172 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167008515655 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848201585694 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843705820011 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12276127215 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115371809027 0.0819641961636 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.