You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download
copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.
To what extent is this a positive or a negative development?
As the world approaches information age, people can access to copyrighted professional resource easier and easier. Therefore, some individuals say this not benefit human beings' creativity even destroy the whole civilization, but the other people do not share who perceive knowledge should be exchanged widely under any situation. However, this essay agree the former view rather later one, and furthermore copyright should be protected in any case.
Transparently, the authors of music or books will lost the enthusiasm to create new works, if People broadcast the copyrighted music and books occasionally. Firstly, people can download authors' works without charge resulting that the authors will have lost income to guarantee their life standard. Secondly, people who downloaded copyrighted music and books from the Internet freely will spoil the fair rule undoubtedly, because the authors of books or music has spent amount of time and finance to improve their skill. Basing on above discussing, if people continue to pirate copyrighted music and books, no people will not write new books and music.
Furthermore, not only can piracy affect the benefits of authors, but also it will destroy the whole human beings' civilization. First of all, if the knowledge can easily access, people will not admire the books, music, recipe, et cetera. For example, individuals can easily download electronic books from the Internet during the short period, they can read few books. Because of this fact, the knowledge of the whole society can not update, meaning its technical and scientific level is stagnating. Thus, people who download copyrighted book and music without authority will prevent the progress of human beings' community.
However, the other persons say that if people can easily downloaded resources from the Internet, it will benefit mankind's development. They usually take developing countries as example. Although, people living in developing countries gain tremendous knowledge from the Internet without any charge, the knowledge level of the whole society gain not impetus.
To recapitulate what is analyzed, This essay supports that the first view completely. People can download copyrighted books and music for no charge is totally negative, and furthermore the lawmakers should institute some codes to limit this behavior.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'approaches'' or 'approach's'?
Suggestion: approaches'; approach's
As the world approaches information age, people can access to c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
... individuals say this not benefit human beings creativity even destroy the whole civil...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...tly, the authors of music or books will lost the enthusiasm to create new works, if ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ut also it will destroy the whole human beings civilization. First of all, if the know...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, first of all, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 1.00243902439 1995% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 965.302439024 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 358.0 196.424390244 182% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55586592179 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73374081564 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 106.607317073 173% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 283.868780488 214% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2797312231 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186899369322 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696971935175 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459782310395 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122267976796 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448392581235 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 40.7170731707 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.