Decades ago, candidates were appointed on the basis of their experience. However, in this current contemporary society, the situation has been changed drastically as the employers now inquire about the personal information from applying individuals. Some people opine that these details are applicable and valuable while others do not. This essay will discuss both views in details first and my opinion the last.
A plethora of people believe that there are benefits to organizations in acquiring personal particulars from the applicant including his or her hobbies, marital status, residential status, et cetera. The primary advantage of obtaining such data is that multinational companies can gauge whether the applicant is fit or suitable for the respective job position or not. For instance, a position that requires a frequent travelling to various metropolitan cities will not be a good-fit for a married person due to his or her married commitments. That is why, employers find it to be useful to inquire about personal details from job applicants.
However, other people consider this process of hiring to be irrelevant and useless as they believe that technical skills and knowledge are more relatable than personal information of a candidate. For example, Companies should merely request applicants for their past experiences where they have shown different qualities like collaboration, coordination, strategic thinking and logical reasoning. Thus, if employers will as more job experience based question, only then they will get more meaningful information about applicants.
In conclusion, there are some people who completely support this system of obtaining personal particulars of applying interviewees while others are against it. In my opinion, companies should conduct an inquiry from aspirants regarding their job experience rather than personalized details
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... details first and my opinion the last. A plethora of people believe that there ...
^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...uld merely request applicants for their past experiences where they have shown different qualiti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 937.175257732 171% => OK
No of words: 281.0 206.0 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69395017794 4.54256449028 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02885236218 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 127.690721649 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601423487544 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 290.88556701 173% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.41237113402 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7470534506 44.8134815571 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 76.5299724578 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 4.34317383033 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334428606812 0.216113520407 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105823902811 0.0766984524023 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415385491566 0.0603063233224 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190108177435 0.12726935374 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305482597671 0.0580467560999 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 8.37731958763 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 70.7449484536 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 7.45979381443 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 8.71597938144 180% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 7.59969072165 132% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 41.2886597938 230% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.