The environment is one of the most important issues in the world today, but governments are not doing enough about it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
First and foremost, it is often claimed that every of the living creature needs clean and peaceful environment to exist. For example, destruction of nature such as deforestation, cattle farming or burning coal and gas have extremely bad impact on our environment. So many new diseases have occurred since the time of the industrial revolution. Plenty of species disappeared from our planet for good. Moreover, people are creating enormous amount of trash every year and the number of living folks on the world is not decreasing but extremely growing up.
Besides I think governments of the countries are more focus on their own local problems and they forget that we are all responsible for our planet. By destroying our natural environment, we will not be able to exist on the planet any longer.
Luckily, there are some practical solutions that can be applied to reduce the problem of global warming and reduce transmission of harmful gases like carbon dioxide causing a green house effects. For instance, planting of trees, use of non-conventional fuel and solar energy, which can significantly help to reduce global temperature. Planting trees will improve the level of oxygen and will cause decrease in harmful gases as trees intake carbon dioxide as a major component of their food. Besides, I believe than governments must encourage people to think of our planet and be more responsibility the environment.
From the arguments I have presented above it can be seen that both arguments definitively have their supporters and opponents. It is my view though that only when governments all countries with their people start working together, we can save our planet and have positive impact on our environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...decreasing but extremely growing up. Besides I think governments of the countries ar...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 32.9175257732 82% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 937.175257732 154% => OK
No of words: 279.0 206.0 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18637992832 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88370355629 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 127.690721649 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598566308244 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 290.88556701 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4787366126 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 16.8248392259 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 4.34317383033 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0288191346664 0.216113520407 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0110908124311 0.0766984524023 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0142193543253 0.0603063233224 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0183841281286 0.12726935374 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00567679653792 0.0580467560999 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 8.37731958763 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 41.2886597938 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.