A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work. You have had a similar problem in the past. Write a reply to your friend. In your letter: tell your friend you understand the problem, explain what happened to you in the past, suggest

Dear Sam,

I received your letter and i am concerned that you are having a problem at your workplace.

I completely understand the pain you are going through right now as i had been through a similar experience at my office a couple of years ago. Though initially i struggled to deal with the issue, i could finally overcome it with my with my hard work and dedication.

I was working for a client Broadcom solutions at that time. Since i was new to the technology that i was working with, i couldn't complete the assigned tasks withing the timeline. As you can imagine, my boss was furious with me, and gave me a piece of his mind. All is well now and i have picked up very well at my work.

The most important advice that i can give you in this situation is to believe in yourself. Find some time off your work and learn the technology that you are struggling with. Also seek advice from your seniors who know better.

I am sure that you will overcome this little obstacle and become successful. Write back when you have time.

All the best!
Jack

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...Dear Sam, I received your letter and i am concerned that you are having a prob...
^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...pain you are going through right now as i had been through a similar experience a...
^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...a couple of years ago. Though initially i struggled to deal with the issue, i cou...
^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...lly i struggled to deal with the issue, i could finally overcome it with my with ...
^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'with my'.
Suggestion: with my
... the issue, i could finally overcome it with my with my hard work and dedication. I was work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... Broadcom solutions at that time. Since i was new to the technology that i was wo...
^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... Since i was new to the technology that i was working with, i couldnt complete th...
^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e technology that i was working with, i couldnt complete the assigned tasks withing the...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...work. The most important advice that i can give you in this situation is to be...
^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...echnology that you are struggling with. Also seek advice from your seniors who know ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 32.9175257732 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 26.3917525773 87% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 937.175257732 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 206.0 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47959183673 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41423050983 2.54303337028 95% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 127.690721649 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 290.88556701 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8791658876 44.8134815571 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5384615385 76.5299724578 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 16.8248392259 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.76923076923 4.34317383033 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 2.54639175258 393% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287069050064 0.216113520407 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105374655158 0.0766984524023 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926052890999 0.0603063233224 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194080220083 0.12726935374 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114613176305 0.0580467560999 197% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 8.37731958763 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 70.7449484536 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 7.45979381443 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.11 8.71597938144 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 7.59969072165 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 41.2886597938 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.