Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on government expenditures in arts, music and recreational works can lead to thought-provoking discussions. my opinion is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, I have mixed thoughts on both sides.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, government has to fund the projects related to arts, music and entertainment, and it is mandatory for any community mental development. it is important to note that when any country has several reputable museums for art works and national music, county`s culture is kept secure from demolishing due to the high globalization trend. Therefore, the aforementioned argument shows that investing in such works is imperative for culture existence.
As every coin has two sides, Major funds consideration on other facilities is vital. First and foremost, governments should focus on other country`s facilities such as healthcare, education and infrastructure, because these are fundamental sources of nation`s development. This exemplifies that other facilities take precedence.
In conclusion, I see that there is equally evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that investment in arts, music and painting is important, but other country`s facilities play a pivotal rule in country`s progress
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
... lead to thought-provoking discussions. my opinion is that irrespective of the num...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...y for any community mental development. it is important to note that when any coun...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.85567010309 363% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 937.175257732 133% => OK
No of words: 218.0 206.0 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70642201835 4.54256449028 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52156175422 2.54303337028 138% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 127.690721649 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623853211009 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 290.88556701 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.41237113402 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5899400799 44.8134815571 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 76.5299724578 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 4.34317383033 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147665710036 0.216113520407 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509229636261 0.0766984524023 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502992219875 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085521624694 0.12726935374 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232083501063 0.0580467560999 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 8.37731958763 196% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 70.7449484536 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 7.45979381443 185% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 8.71597938144 182% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 7.59969072165 124% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 41.2886597938 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.