Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice than eating meat.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.

Essay topics:

Vegetarianism is a more ethical practice than eating meat.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.

Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on the vegetarianism if it is a more ethical practice than eating meat can lead to thought-provoking discussions. Irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, my opinion is that there is a conditional acceptance in different cases.

There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, some people do not eat meat products, because they need to reduce the animal killing rate. It is also important to note that a recent research by a prestigious university shows that that animal life expectancy rate is linked proportionally with the people diet. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that it is more ethical to save the animals by changing people`s diet to be vegetarian.

Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that there are some religions support eating meats, and these people consider animals as the key source for their body’s needs. First and foremost, the meat is the important key source of protein for people, and it has a significant role in body strength. This exemplifies that the animals are created for human food satisfaction.

To sum up, I see that there is equally evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that the vegetarianism is essential to be followed by some people, but many other can not depend on it due to several reasons.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent research'.
Suggestion: recent research
...rate. It is also important to note that a recent research by a prestigious university shows that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05809128631 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09328237653 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589211618257 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4425371506 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159716148998 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580304652924 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042738862786 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843856619699 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411946389299 0.0609392437508 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.