The line picture depicts the information about average carbon dioxide released each human by the four nations from 1967 to 2007.
After analyzing, it can be seen clearly that in initially year in UK each person leaked CO2 almost over 10 metric tonnes then slow declined and reached on 10 metric tonnes in 1987 and then again decreased and in last year reached on under 10. In contrast, in 1987 in Sweden each individual discharge CO2 over 8 metric tonnes and in next year sharply inclined and reached near 10 and in 1987 then again decreased and reached near 7 metric tonnes and in next two years dramatically declined.
The line further collates that in starting year in Italy per human leaked CO2 almost 4 metric tonnes then in next all years increased and reached near about 8 metric tonnes. Whereas, in Portugal CO2 emission by each person almost 2 metric tonnes in 1967, then gradually increased in next years and in last year reached near 6 metric tonnes and merged with Sweden.
Overall, it could be said that in United Kingdom was maximum CO2 released by per human, while minimum in Portugal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and merged with Sweden. Overall, it could be said that in United Kingdom was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 937.175257732 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75129533679 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28913535531 2.54303337028 90% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 127.690721649 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 290.88556701 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 16.3608247423 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3832533906 44.8134815571 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.833333333 76.5299724578 200% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 16.8248392259 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 4.34317383033 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116243973556 0.216113520407 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801644149111 0.0766984524023 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497230501729 0.0603063233224 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952989647922 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487585649938 0.0580467560999 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 8.37731958763 203% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 70.7449484536 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 8.71597938144 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 8.62886597938 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 8.54432989691 173% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 8.15463917526 221% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.