The line graph provides information about the emissions of carbon dioxide in different four countries between 1967 and 2007.
overall, it is clearly evident is that the emissions of CO2 in the United Kingdom and Sweden were steadily decreasing. but on the other hand, during this period Co2 productions dramatically increased in Italy and Portugal.
At the first sight, it is vivid that in 1967 United Kingdom secured the first position with 11 metric tonnes emission and next 10 years it remains stable. After 1977 it declines continuously and reached 8.5 metric tonnes in 2007. On the contrary, Portugal was at least co2 producer. In 1967 and it was just under two metric tonnes emission but the next 30 years it uplifted rapidly and it holds out 5 metric tonnes emission and next 10 years it was unchanged.
Analysing the remaining data which assert that in 1967 CO2 emission has by Sweden and Italy was 4.2 to 8.2 metric tonnes. In the next 10 years, the emission rate in both countries increased significantly. In 1977, released co2 by Sweden reached the peak with 10.2 metric tonnes. But after that, it dropped sharply and emission level became similar with Portugal. On the other hand, Italy outflow uplifted moderately.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...our countries between 1967 and 2007. overall, it is clearly evident is that the emis...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...om and Sweden were steadily decreasing. but on the other hand, during this period C...
^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tonnes'' or 'tonne's'?
Suggestion: tonnes'; tonne's
...cured the first position with 11 metric tonnes emission and next 10 years it remains s...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tonnes'' or 'tonne's'?
Suggestion: tonnes'; tonne's
...n 1967 and it was just under two metric tonnes emission but the next 30 years it uplif...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tonnes'' or 'tonne's'?
Suggestion: tonnes'; tonne's
...ifted rapidly and it holds out 5 metric tonnes emission and next 10 years it was uncha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, at least, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 32.9175257732 43% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 937.175257732 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 206.0 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97584541063 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53058953695 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 127.690721649 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51690821256 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1471361241 44.8134815571 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 76.5299724578 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 16.8248392259 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 4.34317383033 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208895870117 0.216113520407 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841677607655 0.0766984524023 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064758459912 0.0603063233224 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153976062371 0.12726935374 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641664672465 0.0580467560999 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 70.7449484536 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 7.45979381443 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 41.2886597938 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.