Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons. In other words, it is a governmental problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental situation has been a highly debatable topic for decades. Some people believe that current issues become to huge to be addressed without participation of elected officials. I strongly agree with this opinion since preservation of nature is expensive for individuals as well as not profitable for them.
Conservation of environment is a complicated process that require not only keeping the amount of incoming toxins steady but also discarding pollutants that are already in water, soil and air, which costs exorbitantly for personal implementation. Therefore, government can be considered as the unique source of finances for Earth cleaning. On top of that, most of the specific machinery for hazardous waste recycling is owned by public authorities. For example, according to recent studies of Moscow State University, the reduction of greenhouse effect in eastern part of Russia would cost approximately one third of the GDP, which makes it affordable only for state budget. In other words, only legislators possess enough resources to handle global worming.
In addition to the above-mentioned issue, preservation of environment is not beneficial for manufacturers since the decrease in emissions increases production expenses making products less competitive on a market. Hence, only senators are able to enforce production lines modification in favour of nature conservation. For instance, the limits on vehicles’ emissions have reduced air pollution in Germany for eighty percent. Thus, legislation is a valuable tool that is held by national leaders in managing environmental situation.
In conclusion, I undoubtely believe that only governments possess enough financial and influential resources to reduce nature pollution in modern societies.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.85567010309 519% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 937.175257732 162% => OK
No of words: 261.0 206.0 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80459770115 4.54256449028 128% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26234355239 2.54303337028 128% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 127.690721649 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670498084291 0.622605031667 108% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 290.88556701 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.41237113402 135% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9872497324 44.8134815571 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.538461538 76.5299724578 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 4.34317383033 271% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0566598091222 0.216113520407 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229364514582 0.0766984524023 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244067656444 0.0603063233224 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0332883461031 0.12726935374 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262146182575 0.0580467560999 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 8.37731958763 190% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 70.7449484536 36% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 7.45979381443 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 8.71597938144 188% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 7.59969072165 142% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 41.2886597938 247% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 8.62886597938 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 8.15463917526 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.