Nowadays there is a growing trend of private car ownership. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or environmental problems associated with this?
Opinions are divided on whether the benefits of the rapid increase in private car ownership outweigh its drawbacks. I believe that the environmental impact of this trend is too serious to support its advantages.
It is a widely held belief that owning a personal car benefits humankind from being independent and individuals safety point of view. With regard to the former, being a car owner eliminates the dependency on others. This is because they don't have to rely on others to get them to a particular destination and also there is no need to adjust one's schedule to others. Turning to safety, relying on public transport and others puts one's life in the hands of someone else. While the benefit of owning a car gives you the control of driving seat. In this way, one would have more control over the speed of the car and on the outcomes of driving.
However, apart from the advantages mentioned above, the drawbacks of resource depletion and air pollution could be more severe. As for resource exhaustion is concerned, the time is not far when the world would run out of valuable resources, such as petrol and diesel. With the growing trend of private cars, the demand for these resources is increasing drastically and their quantity started falling at a rapid rate. Air pollution is another disadvantage of driving a private vehicle. Evidence for this can be seen in the fact that the harmful gases emitted from the combustion of fossil fuels would give rise to a poor air quality index.
In conclusion, although owning a personal car is advantageous, its drawbacks could not be neglected. For this reason, I believe that the risk of pollution and resource exhaustion is too severe to justify its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...endency on others. This is because they dont have to rely on others to get them to a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ing on public transport and others puts ones life in the hands of someone else. Whil...
^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ones life in the hands of someone else. While the benefit of owning a car gives you t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, apart from, as for, in conclusion, such as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.48453608247 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 4.92783505155 142% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 32.9175257732 64% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 937.175257732 152% => OK
No of words: 293.0 206.0 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8771331058 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68616511019 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 127.690721649 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559726962457 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 290.88556701 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1612469031 44.8134815571 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 76.5299724578 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 16.8248392259 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 4.34317383033 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210997853671 0.216113520407 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667563965046 0.0766984524023 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526946150975 0.0603063233224 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124859655703 0.12726935374 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650943221046 0.0580467560999 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 8.37731958763 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 70.7449484536 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 8.71597938144 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 41.2886597938 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.