Overpopulation is the world's most serious environmental problem.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is no doubt that the population is plummeted in the last few decades. Few people argue that the earth's problems are many, but mostly is overpopulation. I agree with the latter statement and I will explain my view with the relevant examples in this essay.
Firstly, the planet Earth is going through devastation and the overload of mankind is the reason behind it. There are three major issues namely, pollution, extinction of natural conservation, and global warming. The cause of global warming is inversely proportional to the depletion of the ozone layer. It has adverse effects on other parts of the world. For example, the rate of melting glaciers. Although the water occupies 70% of the earth, there is an increase in water levels. Moreover, another issue is the reduction of flora and fauna due to deforestation.
However, these causes are connected to human beings. Another challenge is pollution and this is because of the inappropriate exploitation of natural resources. For instance, the bad sewage arrangements have led to water pollution, whereas the traffic and firecrackers due to the overly populated humans have caused air pollution. Furthermore this excessive-quality of air has led to the disappearance of the ozone layer.
To sum up, the current natural disasters are indeed unavoidable and the foremost reason behind the problems is mostly the excessive population in many countries. I certainly agree and I think this cannot be avoided considering the situation, but can be controlled for the worst that can happen in the future by declining the birth rate, and pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ated humans have caused air pollution. Furthermore this excessive-quality of air has led t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot be avoided considering the situation, but can be controlled for the worst that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, no doubt, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.48453608247 227% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 32.9175257732 46% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 3.85567010309 467% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 937.175257732 144% => OK
No of words: 259.0 206.0 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21621621622 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0061231569 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 127.690721649 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579150579151 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 290.88556701 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.463917525773 862% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7484182975 44.8134815571 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4375 76.5299724578 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 16.8248392259 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 4.34317383033 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131874526543 0.216113520407 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367084225886 0.0766984524023 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054474391859 0.0603063233224 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841461156667 0.12726935374 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691787170426 0.0580467560999 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 8.37731958763 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 8.71597938144 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 7.59969072165 122% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 41.2886597938 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.