The plans below show a science park in 2008 and the same science park today (2021). Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The maps illustrate changes that took place in a science park between 2007 and nowadays.
Overall, the science park has undergone a noticeable development with the appearance of several facilities and cyber paths in order to improve the connectivity within the area.
For the improvement of customers' experience, many buildings have been constructed and expanded. The most noticeable change is the destruction of the grassland located in the Northwest of the map, leaving space for the block of research and development's debut. By contrast with the remainder of the offices and the business units, the reception area has been replaced by a university hub. A period of 13 years witnessed numerous significant changes in the South area, where the expansion of cybersecurity encroached almost all the grass area and a mere space of the car park after being contracted. Further development was the IT center's upgradation into an innovation center as well as a station erected in the empty land at the bottom of the map.
The connectivity has been more focused expressed through the appearance of many paths and roads. A cycle path has been paralleled to the internal road running from West to East, coinciding with a new bus stop situated at the fork in the main road. Moreover, the buildings in the park can be connected with a system of internal paths for access purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cience park between 2007 and nowadays. Overall, the science park has undergone ...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rove the connectivity within the area. For the improvement of customers experie...
^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...ing contracted. Further development was the IT centers upgradation into an innovation ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e empty land at the bottom of the map. The connectivity has been more focused e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 937.175257732 123% => OK
No of words: 228.0 206.0 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06140350877 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8928223334 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 127.690721649 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.622605031667 95% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 290.88556701 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.2747958845 44.8134815571 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 76.5299724578 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 16.8248392259 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 4.34317383033 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998482271425 0.216113520407 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403008335304 0.0766984524023 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506729328678 0.0603063233224 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829519533839 0.12726935374 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476332373991 0.0580467560999 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 8.37731958763 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 70.7449484536 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.