Some people say economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world. Others say that economic growth should be stop immediately to stop damaging the environment. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Poverty is one of the major problems that the world is facing today. To decrease it, economic development seems the only way. While others would argue that economic development is harmful to the nature and it needs to stop, I believe it should not in order to help the humanity.
To begin with, developing the economy by establishing the industries, will help to counter the issue of poverty. It will create enormous amount of job opportunities for unemployed as well as poor people. Also government will have more money by taxes from these Industries. So it will be used to build houses and provide basic needs to poor people this way economic development can help to fight with poverty.
On the other hand, these Industries will increase the environmental issues. The exhaust gases from these Industries will create air pollution. In order to build more and more Industries, there will be need to cut down the trees. So the amount of Carbon Dioxide will also increase. As a result, it will lead to another major problem, global warming. Also chemical and other waste from these Industries will make water and land dirty.
But all these environmental problems can be controlled by successful efforts of the government such as making pollution related norms strict, shutting down only those Industries which are generating more pollution. Finding the effective way to use the alternative renewable energy sources in the industries by funding the research and development programmes. Thus, environmental issues connected to economic development can be reduced and we can use it to burn up the poverty.
To conclude, poverty can only reduced by economic growth. This creates some environmental problems but it can be solved by major steps of the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... for unemployed as well as poor people. Also government will have more money by taxe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... another major problem, global warming. Also chemical and other waste from these Ind...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, thus, well, while, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 4.92783505155 386% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 937.175257732 158% => OK
No of words: 289.0 206.0 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11764705882 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80439527293 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 127.690721649 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 290.88556701 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6804123711 142% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 16.3608247423 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3037528561 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 76.5299724578 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 16.8248392259 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 4.34317383033 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.49484536082 669% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183595341353 0.216113520407 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642232199678 0.0766984524023 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06605307861 0.0603063233224 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127317256924 0.12726935374 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742328993726 0.0580467560999 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 8.37731958763 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 70.7449484536 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 8.71597938144 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 41.2886597938 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 8.54432989691 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.