Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the recent years, there has been surge in nefarious activities. Few people percept that non-bailable punishments will result in the decline of crime rates but there is a contentious argument as others feel felony can be tackled in many other positive ways. This essay will elicit both the points and I will give my perspective on it.
To begin with, nowadays criminal activities have become inevitable. This heinous crimes like murders, robberies and kidnaps leads to a pitfall situation. Hence, a few people have become prudent and they believe stern actions will deteriorate such crimes. Moreover, when such people are given life-term jail sentence it will reduce threat to the society. For instance, it is often seen that people after committing rape try to blackmail the victims due to which the sufferers are skeptical about lodging a complaint against the rapists.
On the other hand, there is a percentage of people who think these criminals should be taught a positive lesson to ensure their better future. Sometimes, there are immature juveniles who commit such felony at a tender age but giving them life-sentence will be unfair. Rather they should be given psychiatric treatment as well as an employment opportunity to overcome their ill thought process. For Instance, there are some countries who conduct psychometric assessment for such criminals and educate them to become a good citizen.
In conclusion, I believe both the points have merits. On balance, it is my opinion that offenders should be given an opportunity to improve themselves. I firmly believe this because it will create a positive society as well as reduce government’s burden to feed criminals free in jail for their life-time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ving them life-sentence will be unfair. Rather they should be given psychiatric treatm...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 937.175257732 155% => OK
No of words: 278.0 206.0 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21942446043 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.78020617076 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81763074412 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 127.690721649 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597122302158 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 290.88556701 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.029528662 44.8134815571 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 76.5299724578 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 16.8248392259 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 4.34317383033 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135360780605 0.216113520407 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431175438364 0.0766984524023 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285892512325 0.0603063233224 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816578175027 0.12726935374 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012687149722 0.0580467560999 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 8.37731958763 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 70.7449484536 63% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 8.71597938144 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 7.59969072165 121% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 41.2886597938 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.