Write a letter to a friend telling him/her that you’re going back to your home town and you want to give him/her some furniture. Please say – Why you thought about him/her – Describe the furniture – Suggest a way for him/her to get it.
Dear Ken,
I hope you are doing good. I am writing to you regarding that I am planning to relocate to my native place. Also, I would like to provide my items of furniture to you before when I plan to leave.
First up all, I am very pleased to inform you that I have got the Government job which one is near to my hometown. Normally, It will take 6 kilometers from my native to my new office in order to this I am planning to relocate to next couple of weeks. I do not want to move with my all furniture items. Thus, I would like to share my furniture items with you. I know that you are going to marry soon and however you need to set up your new house. Currently, I have TV Showcase set, One wooden bed, 4 chairs, single table and I have 1 sofa with me what I like to give it to you. I have a plan that you can come to my house next Saturday morning. We can have a good lunch over here after that we can call for packagers and movers to take my all furniture items and drive back to your house.
Please write back to me with your thoughts for the same. We can plan accordingly depends upon your convenient.
Looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Yours sincerely,
John
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, however, look, regarding, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 52.0 32.9175257732 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 937.175257732 102% => OK
No of words: 234.0 206.0 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.09829059829 4.54256449028 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22168385984 2.54303337028 87% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 127.690721649 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 290.88556701 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.13402061856 142% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6609692543 44.8134815571 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.9333333333 76.5299724578 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6 16.8248392259 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 4.34317383033 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165279557271 0.216113520407 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703818878181 0.0766984524023 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395138870823 0.0603063233224 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112051300987 0.12726935374 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178462248059 0.0580467560999 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.7 8.37731958763 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 70.7449484536 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 7.45979381443 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.2 8.71597938144 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.07 7.59969072165 80% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 41.2886597938 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 8.15463917526 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.