Dear Mr. Smith
I am writing this letter following my absence in the last brainstorming session, held on last Saturday at the planning department of chamber of commerce. Please allow me to elaborate on my reasons regarding my absence in that vital meeting.
First and foremost, I am sorely sorry that I missed such a crucial gathering which I have always longed for. I hope you find it in your heart to accept my apology since there is no history of negligence in my work profile. I would like to explain what made me unavailable at that time.
As you can vividly recall, I have been telling you that my grandfather is in a deteriorated health condition as of late. Unfortunately, we said our last goodbyes to his resting body at the start of this week with deep grief. I could not attend the meeting due to the fact of my presence at his funeral. That was why I could not participate.
However, I am always committed to my job duties and my responsibility at the workplace as you know, and I am not looking for excuses to justify my actions. Therefore, In order to offset my error of not being present, I will make sure to prepare all the materials and reports needed for our upcoming brainstorming for the think tank.
I thank you in advance for your kind understanding,
Amin Motamedi
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 318, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...eded for our upcoming brainstorming for the think tank. I thank you in advance for you...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 32.9175257732 140% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 233.0 206.0 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60515021459 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81340211248 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 127.690721649 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613733905579 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 290.88556701 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.13402061856 120% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9966929915 44.8134815571 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4166666667 76.5299724578 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 4.34317383033 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233162657042 0.216113520407 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800033551557 0.0766984524023 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512883266984 0.0603063233224 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139453396663 0.12726935374 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691631581869 0.0580467560999 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 8.37731958763 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 8.71597938144 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 41.2886597938 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.