You are an employee in an office, working on one big project together with your colleagues. Write a letter to your manager to inform him/her that some of the employees make mistakes that affect your work. In your letter say
- What mistakes have you encountered so far?
- Explain that others employees complained about the same mistakes.
- Suggest a solution to solve this problem
Dear Mr Ryan Lee,
I am writing to express my grievances regarding the software development project for Google that I am working on along with the team. Recently, the number of errors committed by Kim and Jim in coding has significantly increased, thus compromising quality.
Let me explain some of the concerns raised by other employees. Firstly, many of them have encountered similar mistakes from the duo, when they were together. Consequently it resulted in waste of time and duplication of work. Even though extensive training and feedback have been provided, they still perform poorly. Secondly, David, who is also my senior complained that they repeatedly made the same mistakes, irrespective of the simplicity of the task.
Therefore, I believe they should be transferred in another team which does not involve coding. Furthermore, Could you please hire two new resources immediately in order to complete the project on time.
I look forward to your reply.
Yours sincerely,
Mary Smith
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...coding has significantly increased, thus compromising quality. Let me explain ...
^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...compromising quality. Let me explain some of the concerns raised by other employees. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... from the duo, when they were together. Consequently it resulted in waste of time and duplic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 32.9175257732 55% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 26.3917525773 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 937.175257732 91% => OK
No of words: 159.0 206.0 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35849056604 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91525546901 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 127.690721649 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.786163522013 0.622605031667 126% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8850818024 44.8134815571 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.4545454545 76.5299724578 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 16.8248392259 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 4.34317383033 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160273953154 0.216113520407 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561139587296 0.0766984524023 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529794161144 0.0603063233224 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823215240805 0.12726935374 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414392473214 0.0580467560999 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 8.37731958763 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 70.7449484536 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 7.45979381443 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.