You are going on a month training programme to the UK and know that the head of the course would like one of the participants to be the social events organiser.
write a letter to the training Organiser.
expressing your intrest in the role.
requesting more information about it.
explaining what experience you have.
Dear Mr Victor,
I am excited to be a participant in the environment and disaster management training programme that you are organizing next month in London. In order to enhance my skills on that and this is an excellent opportunity for me to do so. when I checked from a follow-up email that you are looking for volunteers for a social event and I offered myself for the role.
Since my college days I have been involved in many voluntary works and possess extensive experience in organizing such events. In my office, I am often responsible for plan important events, coordinate with the event management team, facilitate the guest lecturers and ensure conducting successful meetings. I enjoy playing such roles, and I am quite confident I would be the right person for your social event as well.
I would, therefore, request you to send me more details regarding the training session and your plan for it so that I can start contributing right away. My participant ID is SEL-087 and you can check my profile before selecting me as an organizer.
I am looking forward to hearing from you soon. Thanks in advance.
Yours Sincerely,
David Frank
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring from you soon. Thanks in advance. Yours Sincerely, David Frank
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, regarding, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 32.9175257732 103% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 26.3917525773 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 937.175257732 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89847715736 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8257748457 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619289340102 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1770545175 44.8134815571 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7272727273 76.5299724578 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 4.34317383033 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183107967574 0.216113520407 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647495946118 0.0766984524023 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638677549184 0.0603063233224 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101118038862 0.12726935374 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512953859064 0.0580467560999 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ring from you soon. Thanks in advance. Yours Sincerely, David Frank
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, regarding, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 32.9175257732 103% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 26.3917525773 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 937.175257732 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89847715736 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8257748457 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619289340102 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1770545175 44.8134815571 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7272727273 76.5299724578 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 4.34317383033 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183107967574 0.216113520407 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647495946118 0.0766984524023 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638677549184 0.0603063233224 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101118038862 0.12726935374 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512953859064 0.0580467560999 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.