Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is Mary Anne, I am a resident of Ahmedabad, staying in Science city area. I am writing in context to the information that was printed in your magazine yesterday about Ahmedabad city.
The article written by the writer, on the city was really good, however there were few incorrect information printed in the magazine, to which I want to draw your attention. Firstly, the writer mentioned about the geographical location of Ahmedabad on the West of Gujarat. Correct location is North-East of Gujarat. Secondly, it was printed that the city has a beautiful Riverfront built on the river Narmada, here name of the river needs to be corrected, it is Sabarmati River.
These were minute corrections, but it is really important to provide readers with the correct information, as lot of people coming as a tourist read this magazine to know the city. So, I thought to write up to you with the corrected information, to make the readers experience better.
I know Ahmedabad Now is a big magazine, and such mistakes are a rare event, however, I hope the editor's team proof read the articles twice or thrice, just to eliminate such kind of mistakes in future.
Hope to see the change of information in the article with the above corrected one.
Thank you
Yours Faithfully
Mary Anne
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 191, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...just to eliminate such kind of mistakes in future. Hope to see the change of informati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 32.9175257732 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 937.175257732 117% => OK
No of words: 223.0 206.0 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91031390135 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76955842327 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 127.690721649 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569506726457 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 290.88556701 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.13402061856 109% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0462286564 44.8134815571 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5454545455 76.5299724578 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 16.8248392259 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 4.34317383033 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233989734372 0.216113520407 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855365915794 0.0766984524023 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067916629186 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114437128146 0.12726935374 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262796031738 0.0580467560999 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 8.37731958763 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 7.59969072165 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.