Some people argue that increasing population in urban areas is out rating the number of houses available, which is enforcing to use land on the countryside to provide housing facilities. However, others opine that the space on the country side should be protected and used for other purposes. I believe, it is important to give accommodation to the people, and there are big uncultivated lands on the countryside that can be used to resolve this issue.
Big cities are flooded with the growing population leading to lesser space for building new homes. So, instead of building more homes in already crowded cities, it is sensible to use the space in the rural arear. Providing good housing facilities in the country side will help to distribute the population and lower the congestion in city area. For instance, Government in Ahmedabad started using the land on the outskirts and provided better infrastructure and modern amenities in the newly built houses, that attracted huge number of people to settle there resulting into expansion of the city.
On the other end, there is large area of land available on the country side that is unused. Such uncultivated lands are the best option for construction of homes. However, it is important that the government should protect the fertile land, as that will be required to feed the growing population and shall not be used as a construction site. With the rise in population the demand of food will also increase, so it is better to have farming facilities near the city to avoid any delay in availability of food, and also transportation tax can be avoided.
In conclusion, housing facilities are important and the need for new houses will increase day by day, due to the population rise. So, it is best in everyone's interest that the unused and uncultivable lands on the country side be used to accommodate people rather than continuing the construction in cities. Also, Government should protect the fertile land from being used to build new homes and encourage farming facilities to provide food to the people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98843930636 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79412064176 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479768786127 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8421029483 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.285714286 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189075847895 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734884640221 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570647941661 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127341191299 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469580298299 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.