Dear Amber,
I am writing to say thank you for the invite to your enchanting marriage reception. I had really wished to be with you on time that day. I had to apologize for arriving a bit late due to my car breakdown.
As you know, I need to attend important meeting that day morning. After that, I drove from the meeting conference to your party. Unfortunately, there had a rude driver try to overtake on the serious congestion on the main road and did not aware my car so that my car was crashed and breakdown. After the police coming, I called a taxi to your wedding party but still missing the starting of the wedding.
I felt so ashamed to not to be there from the start as it was such a big day for you, so since I missed the start of the ceremony, I would love to make it up to you. I have tickets to see a Broadway show next Friday. How about it? Please let me know your availability by upcoming Thursday.
I am looking forward to seeing you on next Friday.
Best wish,
Suki
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Dear Amber, I am writing to say thank you for the in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...wished to be with you on time that day. I had to apologize for arriving a bit lat...
^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Best'.
Suggestion: The Best
...orward to seeing you on next Friday. Best wish, Suki
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, really, so, still, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 32.9175257732 97% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 937.175257732 87% => OK
No of words: 191.0 206.0 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.24607329843 4.54256449028 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43687892234 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607329842932 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 290.88556701 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.13402061856 109% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9741373141 44.8134815571 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.3846153846 76.5299724578 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6923076923 16.8248392259 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235358369925 0.216113520407 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723451292943 0.0766984524023 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620521922896 0.0603063233224 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14849724563 0.12726935374 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713266231527 0.0580467560999 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.9 8.37731958763 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 70.7449484536 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 7.45979381443 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.78 8.71597938144 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 7.59969072165 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 41.2886597938 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 8.62886597938 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 8.15463917526 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.