Some people believe that electronic calculators should not be allowed in school until after the pupils have mastered mental arithmetic. Others believe that calculators save pupils time, especially with complicated calculations.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that electronic calculators should not be allowed in school until after the pupils have mastered mental arithmetic. Others believe that calculators save pupils time, especially with complicated calculations.

Nowadays technology is developing more and more, and it is easing people’s work. Just like that calculators are developing too. Pupils prefer it than thinking. Many people consider that pupils have to use it until they become perfect arithmetist. Diversely other people think that calculators economize the time.
In our century pupils calculate easy problems with the help of calculators. It may help to save the time but it stops pupils thinking. Pupils learn on calculators. They do not know that when they are without calculators they feel themselves without hands or legs. So people have to improve their knowledge like a sharpened sword until they finish school. After that they will not need it in the future.
On the other hand people need calculators who work at the market or bazaar. They do not need to calculate in mind. Because their job does not involve to think it in mind. However, when pupils in the exam, it entails to calculate it in mind.
In conclusion, calculators can be useful to some extent as long as some constraints are taken at places where child’s mental ability is involved.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arpened sword until they finish school. After that they will not need it in the futur...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... They do not need to calculate in mind. Because their job does not involve to think it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hink it in mind. However, when pupils in the exam, it entails to calculate it in ...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'may', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230769230769 0.247107548796 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.201923076923 0.15552993741 130% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0528846153846 0.0946569551029 56% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0961538461538 0.0437536398559 220% => Too many pronouns. Try not to use 'you, I, they...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.125 0.122223957237 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0336538461538 0.0403219363162 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6302801559 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0336538461538 0.0326786765898 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0576923076923 0.0861751148067 67% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0144230769231 0.0214082191602 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0192307692308 0.0119246538136 161% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1114.0 1933.38276553 58% => OK
No of words: 188.0 316.052104208 59% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89417989418 6.10592293882 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.20519365927 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.324468085106 0.37474360046 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223404255319 0.284197041944 79% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159574468085 0.203843217982 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.13829787234 0.137313986986 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6302801559 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 176.041082164 61% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.560935902166 102% => OK
Word variations: 52.0417452412 60.7401812628 86% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0911823647 99% => OK
Sentence length: 11.75 20.7725350517 57% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4320589451 49.5273876611 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3725490196 93.4120437189 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7450980392 15.2821509519 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.470588235294 0.594174754866 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.39078156313 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01102204409 60% => OK
Readability: 34.0904255319 49.1922392462 69% => OK
Elegance: 1.125 1.69127372897 67% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Topic essay coherence: 0.326666560243 0.332604825255 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118255694672 0.102734651613 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0817145893151 0.0668474354756 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.483339988626 0.534917948617 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169809326491 0.148666948902 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125681239925 0.13441755203 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590596398999 0.0742828286743 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.284004478712 0.324241079732 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.132349476794 0.0640056729886 207% => No connections among paragraphs
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20117023194 0.22793763319 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707462620805 0.0582452615562 121% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.41883767535 234% => Too many neutral sentences.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.88977955912 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.60220440882 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.00200400802 100% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.493987976 76% => OK

--------------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 5.5 Out of 9