In recent times big cities try to solve the problems caused by the means of transportation and accomodation; thus, governments suggest citizens migrate to the coubtryside. While there area many upsides related to this governmental decision, I am of the view that its drawbacks are considerably more, as this essay discusses.
Moving from big cities to the outskirts is endorsed by a lot of advantages corcerning the mitigation of air pollution and the enlargement of available places to live. Indeed, the influx of inhabitants to the large cities has led to traffic problems and therefore increased emissions of gases. Meanwhile, the majority of people in cities do not live in spacious apartments or sometimes they have no place to live. This is why the aforementioned problems would be soved if governments decide to make people move to rural areas. According to a suvey, the recent decision of the government of the Southern Sweden to persuade its citizens to migrate in the countryside resulted in a decreased percentage of polluntant gases emitted in the atmosphere.
However, bt emigrating to the outskirts of the large cities means an elimination in the available facilities and the professional development as well. More specifically, it is widely stated that the big cities offer a plethora of amenities in comparison with plural areas, from a better heating system of the houses to the variety of the public means of transportation and of the activities that individuals have to spend their leisure time. Moreover, most of the citizens of big cities have decided to emigrate to them in order to find an adequate job or to work in international companies which operate their headquarters in the centre of cities like New York or Singapore. If governments decided to make them be residents of the countryside, this would have an inimical impact in their personal and vocational development.
In conclusion, despite its advantages, a decision of governments proposing to the citizents to emigrate in the outskirts would have detrimental effects for the latter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of air pollution and the enlargement of available places to live. Indeed, the in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16131946251 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9396858442 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.166666667 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182519143258 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657915676316 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496344672446 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951860160758 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068584480573 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.