It is undeniably true that the last century has witnessed rapid development as well as technological advancements not only in the health industry but also in every field. While it is commonly believed that these improvements have helped mankind in many ways, few experts are of opinion that still there are plenty of flaws. In my view, although life has been much better than earlier, we could expect further expansions in the future.
To embark upon, there are a plethora of benefits to humans from these developments. The first point worth making is that health professionals have successfully developed both medicines and sophisticated equipment for fatal diseases and this has significantly extended the lifespan of citizens. It is also important to acknowledge the revolution in technology and how it helped anyone to connect with friends and family virtually. In addition to that, it also enabled work from anywhere feature and added a whole new dimension to the working environment. Thus, providing more work-life balance to the citizens.
However, there are few potential downsides as well. The most worrying aspect of these enhancements is, humans are compelled to be materialistic and most of them are living in an isolated world with no human attachments. As a result, socialization slowly obsolete. It is also worth pointing out that although many evolutions have come in various fields, the world has not yet prepared for unprecedented phenomenal. For instance, no vaccine has been found for a recent outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.
To conclude, no one denies the fact that standards of living have been improved a lot compared to our grandparent's age. However, there are still plenty of problems which should be addressed for better living and hopefully, in the future, we might have a better environment for human beings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xpect further expansions in the future. To embark upon, there are a plethora of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23569023569 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95843317654 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0747566008 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156778904823 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435265256159 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397980521346 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960503420752 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416790696852 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.