alternative sources like wind are more positive than fossil fuels sich as oil and gas
agree or disagree?
Fossil fuels known as one of the most important resources of energy in worldwide. Beside this, in recent decades, use of other sources e.g: wind, solar and even nuclear energy increase strictly in many countries. I strongly believe that using of these sources have many advantages for individuals and governments, and is a positive invest.
There are several reasons for this view that alternative sources such as wind or solar are beneficial for people. In my view, the most important reason is, reduce pollution in cities, and decrease of disease among individuals. Nowadays, the majority of cars and companies utilize of fossil fuels for energy production. The emission of toxic gases from these machines like CO2 and CO can have detrimental impacts on the individual’s healthy and ozone layer. The hearth problem and breath damages because of air pollution are the sample of these diseases. In addition, penetrate of ozone layer also, lead to publish of X-ray on the surface earth, that is destructive for human skin, and can become cause of skin illnesses. Alternative energies, not only, do not have any above negative effects, but also help to air pollution and do not have harmful for people. For this reason are suitable for using.
Another reason for being benefit alternative sources is, these resources are infinity and cheaper than fossil fuels. According to witnesses of researcher, fossil fuels (e.g: oil, coil and gas) will finish by 2050. Therefore, the governments should find other sources for replacing it. Wind and solar are the best substitute because, they are accessible everywhere and also, have a sufficient powerful for energy production in companies and cars. Likewise, the cost of their production is much inexpensive compared to fossil fuels. We need the advance technologies and machines for drilling earth and extraction of petroleum or gas. But, for producing of solar energy, for example, we need the number of plate placed in front of the sun.
To sum up, utilization of replacing sources like wind or solar instead of fossil fuels, is an excellent idea not only for people throughout the world because of reducing illness(e.g: hearth and skin ailments), but also is beneficial for government because they are economical and available.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22282608696 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74598946042 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0487297168 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.157894737 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175344131556 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577606676485 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526783374081 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118657181433 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272365932717 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.