Although there is alot of translation software available, learning to language still could be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
According to statement, technical become a pivotal part of daily basis in every sector. Therefore, there are lot of softwares which are available to translate languages. Yet, learning of language is still become a great advantage in numerous ways. I completely agree with this notion and reasons are discussed below.
To begin with, technology become hot potatoes in contemporary settings, therefore some individuals consider that learning of any skill is wastage of time. However, it is not procrastinate because, there are lot of positive impacts of learning. First and foremost impact is increase in knowledge. In this criteria, if individuals learn languages rather than to avoid electronic gadgets for translation, then this become lead to increase in their knowledge fact. By learning languages of another nation, they become aware of their life style, culture, diversity and so on. As a result, this shows positive impact and become beneficial to them.
Moreover, if masses learn another language of different nation, then this leads to a great impression in their life style to. For instance, mostly people prefer to learn foreign tongues. Due to this, they also learn about their culture and their society too, which shows prominent flash on their thinking. Because, by learning western culture, they avoid discrimination between anything or in any way and become open minded. As a result, learning of language become advantageous to society also and increase the personality of a person in front of public and so on.
To recapitulate, it seems to me that, learning of language has numerous benefits to an individual and their society to. Because, this increases their knowledge and personality factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'procrastinated'.
Suggestion: procrastinated
... is wastage of time. However, it is not procrastinate because, there are lot of positive impa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ost impact is increase in knowledge. In this criteria, if individuals learn language...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33210332103 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84141946468 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557195571956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2088911261 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145251910513 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534022366051 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553147712831 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104448396363 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570097152927 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.