With and increasing population communicating via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is been widely known that the Internet has already occupied human's way to communicate. In some sort of arguments, it is been agreed that the prevalence of the Internet appliance could alienate and immediate interaction.
Nowadays, the apps developers invent over than a hundred social-media apps and adjust them with human need. At the earlier appearance, people had trouble with delayed receiving mail, but after e-mail invented, the senders will not worry anymore due to it is received fastest than the old one. Soon after this invention, the system was developed to an e-chatting messenger. With this, people could conveniently chat with their friends and families without length and space boundaries. Lastly, because of some admirers do not satisfy with e-chatting service which does not give face recognition. The developers invented a new app, a video call. With this invention, the member of families will not miss their close-knit's face even though they are separated within and island.
On those advanced system of the internet, it could ease human problems of communication which are related to time and cost. Internet customers could minimize a time and it can bring a good effect on their work duties, as such, sending letter of agreements, project layout approvement to some clients. Furthermore, it would decrease the outcome, and consequently, the profits will get in handy. Prior to technology era, businessman adds some petrol cost to his budget, but after e-chat is invented they erase it due to meeting client already been held in the social-media group virtually.
Wit those privileges that are given by the Internet, modern people gradually will leave the traditional way to communicate due to the fact that old fashion could not advance their lifestyle and business marketing. Above all, we all already lived in the future. A time when space and length have not been regarded as a problem issue in advanced communication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, lastly, so, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20317460317 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77788480519 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596825396825 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7388730491 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139220140746 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423371489965 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039579416301 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752367873395 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213425665167 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.