The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part-time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The graphs describe the share of full and part-time workers of two sexes, male and female, between 1973 and 1993. In general, the number of female employees accumulates bigger share in both types of works than man employees. In addition, in the full-time of works, the number of male workers decreased but not in female workers. Moreover, in the part-time job, both sexes have the same situation in both given years.
Female workers population had posted over 10% in both years, while males had overtaken the female workers in a full-time job, but at a part-time job the number situated below 10%. At the full-time employment, the number of man employees increased to near 100% in 1973 but plummeted around 80% in 1993. Contrastively, female employees, their number similarly reached out over 50% in both years.
In the part-time job, both workers increased in 1993, male employees reached out over 20%, while in 1973 the number would not go far from 10%. Similarly, females employees, in 1993, their share went far from over 30%, and in 1973 they only stopped at below 20%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... situation in both given years. Female workers population had posted over 10% in both ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, similarly, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88524590164 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50418742146 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48087431694 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4775702887 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222838493705 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112789019482 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718032064529 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172102959708 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200117565679 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.