It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports or musicians.Discuss both these views and g

Essay topics:

It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports or musicians.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In general, a talented person has known generally a gift that embedded strongly through his predecessors' genetic. However, in another contrastive argument, it is never be found that the born baby immediately with such a strong ability to walk or to speak, but he needs to learn intensively.
Both contrastive views cannot be investigated clearly without a connection with a brain. All human have an equal capacity to use brain properly except children prodigy. All talented children can push their brain's storage above common capacity. So that is why a child prodigy, Joey Alexandria, has already mastered a beautiful complex jazz musical in his age of 9.
All neurological scientist may believe that the pianist prodigy experiences a brain activity differently with others child-pianist learners. A gifted pianist childern use their motoric- hemisphere part to conduct their instrument. In another hand, a common child learner manifests his memory and motoric sense separately to play piano. In this way, a child prodigy plays musical instrument as easy as he walks, runs, and other motoric control bodies. In another side, a common child has to rely on his musical theory which already had memorized.
The educationists may argue that point of view. All baby are brought to life with a blank space of the brain. A genetic may take a role only 10%, and the rest of prevalence goes to teaching to shape an individual capability. A kindergarten may become a great musician in early ages due to successful learning alone without any genetic value.
In the part of all, I personally agree that learning may become a role factor in shaping human ability but it is not an essential and cannot be realized without the role of the special and unique body and mind shape in every human has. The great vocalist of the Queen has a unique sound that he can sing louder in f tone higher than others rock vocalists. His special sound is supported by the shape of his mouth, additional teeth in the back of the mouth. In so forth, a unique anatomy shape and a rare brain activity synchronize with learning capability that is the way to becoming a great musician.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...runs, and other motoric control bodies. In another side, a common child has to rel...
^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th a blank space of the brain. A genetic may take a role only 10%, and the rest o...
^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shaping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: shaping
...the rest of prevalence goes to teaching to shape an individual capability. A kindergarte...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, as to, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90410958904 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73458421612 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564383561644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1396513613 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2105263158 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.31578947368 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136776702514 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421613665329 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311396477056 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744630334457 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187111995824 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.