The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions?
For human society to grow, the cost to pay is the living world of animals, therefore a vast of different species are being pushed to the verge of extinction. Some works like deforestation, industrialization along with rampant illegal hunting are the driving forces behind such a tragedy, and people should join with the government in an effort to overcome the consequences and protect wild, endangered animals.
There are many reasons why there is an increase in the number of endangered animals due to human activities. On land, forest, meadows which are the roofs for thousands of animals, now have to make room for agriculture-forestry production, mineral exploitation, or for urban development. Thence, many wild creatures, whose habitat is forest are put on the brink of extinction. With the marine ecosystem, untreated toxic sewage is discharge directly from manufacturing plants and households into the sea, which pollutes the living space of marine animals. For example, in 2016, Formosa - a steel producing company - released liquid waste into the sea in the centre of VietNam, leading to massive deaths of fishes.
In addition, a lot of animals are being poached due to products made from their body parts. In Africa, the last male white rhino dead in march 2018 and there are only two female now. Although laws and regulations are implemented in an attempt to protect endangered species, however, it did not prevent poachers.
Some effective measures need to be taken to increase animal preservation. First of all, the expansion of heavy industries should be limited by law to keep the natural environment for these animals untouched. Secondly, the government must apply more severe punishments for any harmful activities to forests, which is home for many animals on land. Besides, they should invest more money in upgrading pollution treatment systems to clean sewage before dumping it into rivers or oceans and strongly handle violators such as deprivation of operation license.
In conclusion, the danger of wildlife on land or in sea stems from irresponsible activities of people and several solutions need to be done to mitigate its adverse effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28530259366 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96075484363 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622478386167 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9822189288 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.266666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177344302988 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553869260485 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614504683317 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908681405176 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414766298483 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.