Animal species are becoming extinct as a result of human activities on land and in sea. Why has this happened? What's the solution?
It is true that many terrestrial and marine animal species are now endangered as a result of the actions of humans. Various forms of environmental destruction have brought about this situation, and solutions must be found and implemented urgently.
The decline in many animal species stems from pollution or habitat destruction.Pollution resulting from human activity is one of the main reasons why manyanimals are on the brink of extinction. Aquatic life, such as coral reefs, are particularly sensitive to such irresponsible behaviour as the dumping of toxic waste into oceans and rivers. Another important factor is the environmental degradation caused by deforestation and the industrialization of agriculture. Tigers in Indonesia, for example, rarely survive in the wild following the clearing of rainforests, and they are now protected in designated wildlife reserves where, at least, they have freedom to roam, to exhibit their natural behaviour andto breed.
Solutions must be adopted to deal with this decline in animal species. Investment in sanitation systems will help protect water sources on which humans and animals both depend to survive. The marine environment must be cleaned up and international legislation strictly enforced to prevent actions such as the discharge of chemical waste into the sea or the practice of whaling. In order to save species from extinction, the conservation role of zoos must be prioritized. Many zoos and safari parks, for example, now have successful captive breeding programmes, of which the giant panda is perhaps the most famous. Endangered species must be protected also in their natural habitats through the elimination of poaching and the creation of more wildlife reserves.
In conclusion, humans are part of the animal kingdom and have a moral duty to save species from extinction by taking steps to curb pollution and habitat destruction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Pollution
...s from pollution or habitat destruction.Pollution resulting from human activity is one of...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45918367347 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.157109437 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.179196134 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203016243252 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068329611039 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651493732019 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128285696683 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220518301533 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.