Probably one of the most remarkable breakthrough in human history, the Internet has become an essential tool in our daily life. Life without the Internet would seem to be far more complicated - if not even impossible - to us: activities that once people could only have dreamed of , like working from home, purchasing items from all over the world, booking hotels in exotic destinations, are nowadays commonplace. Besides this practical and certainly positive side of the Internet, it is also worth mentioning a rather negative aspect of it revolving around misinformation and fake news users come across when they access the Internet.
Cheap and steadily stable Internet connections, combined with affordable computer prices have lead to an increase in the percentage of people who actually access the Web. Scrolling through Internet sites, it is quite easy to read all kind of information, from politics to science to news. Along serious and proved news provider, blogs run by users without any proper education have been cropping up in the last years and this trend seems to be unstoppable. Concealed behind a screen, everyone is virtually in the position to spread distorted information. The Internet can be encyclopedia as well as junkyard at the same time.
Especially when it comes to politics or science, distinguish between solid statements and utter falsity is not always easy. To make matters worse, rubbish is more quickly and widely disseminated than it used to be in the past, for the news can these days reach every corner of the planet in a couple of seconds. Lack of control, anonymity, ignorance could therefore fuel a ripple effect of falsehoods that can misinform people and potentially endanger lives.
In conclusion, despite the Internet has actually improved life conditions, users should also be aware of the risks they can run into when they are searching for information. Double checking, referring to various sources of information are steps that everyone who is seeking for reliable information should take.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t once people could only have dreamed of , like working from home, purchasing item...
^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l a ripple effect of falsehoods that can misinform people and potentially endange...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, if, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24464831804 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8383135618 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648318042813 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4927966173 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.923076923 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157711420529 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544800731629 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369204777824 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903276206046 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298036688995 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.