around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible. do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Some argue that it is a positive outcome when our working and studying habits have been altered to keep up with the frantic pace of modernity as its technology has become more affordable and accessible, such as when adults began working from home and children began taking more and more online classes instead of traditional onesHowever, I completely disagree with this statement since it could lead to a significant downfall rather than a good one.
On the one hand, humans are social creatures since social interactions and communication among fellows are crucially irreplaceable. Working from home could considerably reduce interactions among co-workers in a company, or students in online classes are unable to talk and discuss with their classmates in person in a class, which can result in learning problems, depression, stress, and suicide due to a huge lack of real-life connections, and so do adults who have to work remotely for a long time. It can be proven clearly that during the COVID-19 quarantine, when people had to suffer the isolation, the rate of suicides was recorded at three-fold more than usual.
On the other hand, the accessibility and convenience of modern technology are undeniable. What to say, during the recent COVID-19 quarantine, thanks to technological accomplishments, such as smartphones, laptops, and iPads, people could keep their work, business, and study on track smoothly. As a result, adults could earn a living and youngsters could catch up with their studies until the difficult period was over. Without technology, the situation could have been drastically appalling.
All things considered, though technology has become an inevitable part of our life, I still prefer conventional way of working and studying. Interacting and communicating with one another directly is always great, as technology should be the second alternative for us.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35016835017 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05816966213 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.323484435 49.4020404114 237% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.9 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2239792058 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692641070278 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742635141696 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130000832745 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081132778746 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.