The traditional way of teaching is nowadays dealing with new methods and it is argued that Artificial Intelligence will take the place of educators. I totally disagree with this statement, because AI is not such advanced to deal with education skills. However, online classes could be put in place of conventional teaching.
The increasing intelligence of technology has not reached the point of replacing humans in classes. Even if machines are clearly able to do many jobs better than humans can, in terms of educating the young population they are incapable of providing feedback in pupils’ work and identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the latter. To illustrate this, the ineffectiveness of robots related to literacy is obvious in the Google translate, which is an application to find the meaning of a word in other languages; it is not a substitute to the personal learning of words.
As for the alternative to the traditional teaching, in my opinion, online courses could be the norm in the future. They save both teachers and students time and infrastructure costs. By using this technology with the basic requirements of a laptop and internet connection, students can learn from all over the world, while they can revise anytime they want to. For example, top universities, such as Stanford and Oxford, have already implemented online courses to their curriculum giving the opportunity to anyone to attend them.
To sum up, replacing teachers with artificial intelligence may be plausible in the coming years; however, in my personal point of view, it is not beneficial for students due to the lack of such advancements in education and online courses could be an alternative solution to the conventional teaching method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... put in place of conventional teaching. The increasing intelligence of technolog...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, while, as for, for example, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20921985816 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06537465977 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6212105621 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.545454545 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206482091593 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726409619859 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632587117883 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125032364455 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054061350439 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.