The proportion of people consuming sugar containing drinks is extremely increased in recent years. This is mainly caused by the changes in lifestyle, while there are a number of solutions eliminating this, including government’s incentives and companies’ campaigns.
The reason why people choose more sugar-based drinks is their different behavior in terms of their dietary lifestyle compared to past decades. In fact people in modern societies consume a lot of fast food with soft drinks or canned drinks, mainly because they cannot cook their own meals due to the fast based daily routines. Another factor is that people are affected by the advertisements and TV's anchors who basically promote sugar based drinks. As a result, individuals, and especially teenagers, change their habits more easily. To illustrate this, according to a survey, Greek people are affected by the advertisements of a soft drink called 3cents, as long as they see these drinks in every means of transportation and in the TV as well.
The aforementioned high consumption of sugar based drinks can be decreased effectively if governments and companies move towards this goal. With regards to governments, health education could be a solution by advising and instructing people about the risks and the health problems related to the high intake of sugar. People should be aware of the serious effects of sugar, for example the diabetes. Meanwhile, companies should launch campaigns which would inform people about the inimical effects of sugar consumption rather than promoting only the pleasant side of their drinks. By doing this people would reduce consuming such drinks and have more awareness about health problems.
To sum up, the high proportion of people drinking sugar-based drinks is due to the transformation in their habits. However, it can be reduced with joint actions by societies and enterprises.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pleasant side of their drinks. By doing this people would reduce consuming such drin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, for example, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38926174497 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92357189844 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3286461597 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372205313286 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136965816472 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844192501263 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225048959565 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578096619475 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pleasant side of their drinks. By doing this people would reduce consuming such drin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, for example, in fact, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38926174497 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92357189844 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3286461597 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372205313286 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136965816472 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844192501263 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225048959565 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578096619475 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.