The proportion of people consuming sugar containing drinks is extremely increased in recent years. This is mainly caused by the changes in persons' lifestyles, while there are a number of solutions to eliminate this along with government's incentives and companies' campaigns.
The reason why people choose more sugar-based drinks is their different behavior in terms of their dietary lifestyle. The modern culture has today's people consuming fast food with soft drinks or canned drinks, which may be more convenient according to their responsibilities and style of living. Moreover, people are affected by the advertisements and TV's anchors who basically promote sugar based drinks. As a result, individuals, and especially teenagers change, their habits more easily. To illustrate this, the most profitable company in Greece is the 3cents firm, which owns the titled soft drink; the majority of advertisements in the media and the means of transportation promote this drink entering in everyday life of Greeks.
The aforementioned high consumption of sugar based drinks can be decreased effectively if governments and companies move towards this goal. With regards to governments, health education could be a solution by advising and instructing people about the risks and the health problems related to the high intake of sugar. People should be aware of the serious effects of sugar, for example the diabetes. Meanwhile, companies should launch campaigns which would inform people about the inimical effects of sugar consumption rather than promoting only the pleasant side of their drinks. By doing this people would reduce consuming such drinks and have more awareness about health problems.
To sum up, the high proportion of people drinking sugar-based drinks is due to the transformation in their habits. However, it can be reduced with joint actions by societies and enterprises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pleasant side of their drinks. By doing this people would reduce consuming such drin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, while, as to, for example, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51546391753 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93372187818 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570446735395 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6155951129 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240344348003 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091955768724 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534188575113 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158410224465 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202369300865 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.