The best way to educate children is by using Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways of making lessons effective for children?
It is widely known that modern technologies are developed in almost every aspect, just as Internet is proposed to be useful approach to educate young people in every lesson. I partially disagree with this notion for several reasons and there are several possible alternatives to offer lessons more effectively.
Perhaps, one of plausible reasons is that the using of Internet affect negatively to children development due to that such technology not only lacks their intellectual ability but also may lead to addiction. It is assumed that, for instance, if children were addicted to access Internet, they would rely on it to accomplish their works in every lesson. Thus, this could let children not to be openly critical. Furthermore, the excessive use of Internet brings about some health-related issues such as eye disorder and obesity. It might appear that, these days, many children use thick-lensed glasses and deal with obesity at an early age which is likely adverse effects of using Internet.
Regarding the possible alternatives, we could involve children to multi-sensory learning method which encourages children to learn subjects in more funny ways such as games, rule cards and puzzles. It might appear that, this approach could develop children’s ability and stimulate their brain to comprehend subjects practically. In addition, unlike Internet that only shows information visually, recreational activity seems to be the suitable alternative for children. Those activities such as school trip and study tour play an important role to support the comrehension of subjects. To demonstrate this, introducing young people to museum and historical places presumably gives positive improvement of learning subjects.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that Internet contributes negative impacts to young generation considering their developments and health problems to be the most prominent goals. Therefore, several possible alternatives such as multi-sensory learning approach and recreational activities would bring children to learn every subject more creative and more effective ways.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70700636943 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02506198954 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601910828025 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3405790254 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256342366846 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877083411349 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503718884908 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156912035744 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567479061345 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.