Some people support modern development in agriculture such as factory farming and creation of new types of fruits and vegetables. However, other people oppose this view. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In this century, modernity has been almost in all fields, including agriculture aspects. While a group of people state that the efficacy of agriculture results in modifying crops and harvest process, others contend the opposite views. There are arguments on both sides, however, which I will consider in this essay.
On the one side, the proponents assume that advancement of technologies in agriculture modifies farming production, especially for factory farming, can bring up more food supplies that have better quality products. Furthermore, modern farming improvements invent various types of plants that hopefully provide the growing populations. It is believed that if the new types of plants such as halophytes, saltwater resistant plant, was plant successfully in mass production, this would raise the finance of farmers and factories as well. Moreover, the use of modern technologies in agriculture might lessen labor intensive, by this I mean that this could increase productivity of the workforce.
On the other side, the opponents claim that the maintenance of recent technologies may meet an escalating cost considering that such technologies frequently have a special treatment. It also might be said that, the invention of plants-genetic structure likely reveal flaws and dangers. For instance, a new plant aiming to be more edible food could become poisonous for humans or animals. Finally, those who oppose the modest improvements, particularly in agriculture, highlight the diminishing workforce in factories. It could be seen that if more and more modern farming process was used such as machines and tools, this would mean the end of workforce. Thus, this may cause severe unemployment around the world.
All in all, in spite of some possible drawbacks, personally I believe that positive agricultural improvements can lead to better quality of plants or animals and useful aspects of farming. This is provided that this is under the close supervision of government in terms of utilization of agricultural technologies, plants-variety invention and employment levels.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i mean, in fact, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55485893417 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12003105804 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605015673981 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3916291842 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.133333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199540085957 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641437658922 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331000770878 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122397284446 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437987804705 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.