It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sport person or musician. Discuss both views and give your own opinion!
One of the heated issues nowadays relates to whether some people are inheritably equipped with gifted talents, such as arts or sport, or that is possible to acquire such talents through the conventional method of learning and challenging work. However, there are several arguments which I am going to shed both viewpoints in this essay.
On the one side, it is often cited that many gifted people would effortlessly be capable of pursuing their success. Those people need not work hard to deliberately show their skills. As a result, they have earned fame and awards at an early age. Furthermore, talking about biology theory about genes, children may inherit similar skill to their parents. For example, young multi-talented artist, Jaded Smith follows the footsteps of his father, Will Smith. This young artist has acted in many films since he was a kid. It has experimented that a skilful parent would have children being an artist as well.
On the other side, other people point out that every talent could be shaped and improved. Starting to repeatedly do activities where children are interested in might lead them to excel in a profession or talent such as art or sport. In addition, those who oppose a gifted talent argue that most parents supervise their children’s hobbies in order to support and guide the children to success life. One of the great examples is Indonesian badminton player, Jonatan Christie who has trained since he was young and has won many international championships. Therefore, it goes without saying that this could be accomplished with never-ending exercise to possess tremendous talent.
Overall, my own feeling is that a trained talent may receive benefits to children both mentally and physically because this brings motivation and triumph to their life. Of course, this is balanced between good preparations and well-trained circumstances.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, of course, such as, talking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22368421053 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81542053658 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634868421053 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2731424807 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113879097943 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349110760404 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331764490011 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695506510568 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346273780257 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.