The best way to reduce traffic congestion in cities is to provide free public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The increasing traffic congestion in this century has been an enormous problem for most countries around the world, especially in major cities, just as a controversial issue to ease this is to offer public transport for free. Personally, I oppose this issue for several reasons which I will outline in this essay.
The primary reason for this is that some people tend to rank their safety and comfort when commuting and travelling anywhere. Thus, free public transport may not encourage them to lower the use of private vehicles. It presumably seems that many people are anxious about crimes, such as robbing and sexual harassment, increasing at this present time. By this I mean, though, it is free, the government could not fully guarantee passenger's safety on public transport, thereby travelling by private vehicles might be the well-chosen transport.
First and foremost, efficient time travel and intended destination are other primary reasons for most people not to select public transport. As public transport sets timetable and has its limitation of operating schedule, people will probably assume that it is inefficient, especially for people's business. In addition, it might emerge that public transport could put passengers (all ages) in danger because of rush-hour time demanding people to walk through the jostling crowd.
I accept that some people think differently, saying that free public transport might economize the societies' budget, in a view of reduction in spending money on gasoline for their private vehicles. In spite of this, perhaps government uses public revenues to support that transport by means of increasing road and vehicle taxes. Thus, society will keep spending more money on this.
To conclude, I believe that providing free public transport will not alleviate traffic congestion because people will keep using their own vehicles considering negative effects that may spring from public transport such as uncertain people's safety, possible harmful circumstance and inefficient time travel.
Comments
would you please check and
would you please check and response my writing, Sir?
This essay doesn't have big
This essay doesn't have big issues, but it is not outstanding. So you got 6.5.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, thus, well, i mean, in addition, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49044585987 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7072386562 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9706848542 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.615384615 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171258042208 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697209625814 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05682078262 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112478695905 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350130846926 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.