It is undeniable that, there has been surging number of cars purchased in urban areas all around the world in past two to three decades, which leads to a massive traffic jam in most of the metro cities. However, a group inhabitant perceives that government body should provide free public transit to each individual for around the clock as well as every day, in order to tackle the traffic issues. I agree with this statement to a large extent. My arguments are justified in the ensuing paragraphs.
There are innumerous reasons to support free public transit. The foremost one is that most of the traffic congestion occurred due to an immense number of cars. For instance, according to survey conduct by The Times of India, cities such as New York, London and Delhi suffered from massive jam because of innumerous cars. Another reason is, if the government provides free public comminuting to each individual, they would prefer to travel in buses and trains rather than their own cars. To illustrate this, in Ahmadabad BRTS bus service is popular even though it's not free.
Moreover, by using public transport people can save petrol as well as the maintenance cost of a car. As a result, it encourages them to save money by using public transport. To represent this, Melbourne-a best living city around the world, providing all-time free tram facility for everyone that would help the city to manage traffic hurdle. Furthermore, a better public transport for the public can diminish traffic congestion as the dweller of the urban areas would significantly use public transit.
On the contrary, I would not overlook the downside too. Providing free commuting has many detrimental influences on each individual and country. To begin with, the administration will have to bear a huge burden of costs. In other words, the government would be enhanced taxes on a routine product as a result inflation rate will escalate. Furthermore, public transit has limited stoppage; it would difficult to explore the city by using public transit.
To sum up, it can be said that, in order to control traffic jam the best solution is to improve public transport system. However, the government should not provide free of cost travelling as the free transit has a menacing impact on the economy of the nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00520833333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65230507714 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0365815084 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245987277682 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694694684204 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526736298358 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139472334257 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426832635844 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.