It is undeniable that, these days robots are playing an essential role in our routine task, in which they perform the intricate task with the enormous level of accuracy. There has been scattered opinion examined on its prospective modification. A group of bourgeois perceives that robots are significantly crucial for approaching mankind advancement. Although, a group of inhabitants admits that robots are harmful as well as they have many detrimental influences on our society. Therefore, before commenting on my view both the views should be examined.
Examining the former view, there are innumerous reasons to support the automation development. To begin with, Robots speed up the production process as well as they are very efficient in repetitive tasks. For instance, these days car manufacturer companies such as Mercedes, BMW and walks wagon are using automatic technology for car production. Another reason is that they can also work in extreme conditions where humans are helpless, thus reduce the risk of people’s death. To illustrate this, worldwide robots are utilizing in the nuclear power plant, which has menacing radioactive rays for human beings. Furthermore, robots can work without a break as they do not have any sense.
Although, a group of antagonist believes that advancement in the field of automation is extremely harmful to each individual. The foremost reason is, there could be an increase in unemployment in the future as robots could replace many employees at their workplace. To represent this, robots have already started to work in industries and indoor activities as well. Moreover, robots could be out of control occasionally, and probably they can harm humankind. Furthermore, maintenance and implementation cost are much higher, this could be increased production cost.
To sum up and give my opinion, it can be stated that advancement in the field of automation is a good phenomenon. However, the technologist must concentrate on the mankind safety as well as their importance in society as the robots could be replaced them. (Words: 326)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...n repetitive tasks. For instance, these days car manufacturer companies such as Merc...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...break as they do not have any sense. Although, a group of antagonist believes that ad...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38719512195 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04310294525 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588414634146 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3071509954 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187334397481 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538967963332 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359142128693 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107482767788 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387835055032 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.