Nowadays, people always throw the old things away when they buy new things; whereas in past, old things were repaired and used again. What factors cause this phenomenon? What effects the phenomenon leads to?
It is undeniable that, these days’ inhabitants prefer to purchase new objects rather than repairing an old one. However, a few decades back, people were using the repairable item instead of repairing them. There are innumerous causes behind this concept along with its immense effects. Both the causes and its influences are discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
Examining the causes of purchasing new objects, the foremost one is, these days all the amenities available in the advanced form which would attract the buyer. For instance, TV and smartphones are providing enormous features than ever before. Besides this, the new product has elegant design including lighter in weight. To illustrate this, the modern laptop is lighter in weight as compared to the traditional computers. Furthermore, the buyer would concentrate on the efficiency of the product. Consequently, they would not prefer to repair old objects as the advanced technology indulged them in the test of the quality essence.
Although, this phenomenon has few detrimental influences. To begin with, there has been surging number of electronics garbage examined in the environment. To represent this, people throw electronic gadgets in our ecosystem; these gadgets have poisonous elements which would menace life cycle of many species. Moreover, plastic pollution is escalating its optimum level due to huge waste exposed by dwellers. Besides this, the demand of natural abundance has increased because of the buyer purchasing the new product. As a result, the element such as aluminium, steel, lithium and copper are under threat level of natural stock.
To sum up, it can be said that purchasing new appliances is a good phenomenon in modern society. However, every individual should try to use repaired and recycled product as the environment obligation is on top priority. (Words: 290)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 302, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: lighter
...ew product has elegant design including lighter in weight. To illustrate this, the modern laptop ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: lighter
...o illustrate this, the modern laptop is lighter in weight as compared to the traditional computer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 632, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hem in the test of the quality essence. Although, this phenomenon has few detrimental in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41580756014 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8144938293 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635738831615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1142569994 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5555555556 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176431035657 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468220169097 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040769952143 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103774895625 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327215709284 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.