The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skill.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, people possess distinctive outlooks with regard to seeking a decent way that is aimed at productively educating adolescents. Many opine that training parents with parental skills are the most superior way when it comes to lessening youth crime. From my perspective, parents’ instruction is worth recognizing, however, teachers also have many significant influences on children’s thoughts.
Initially, it stands to reason that familial parenting is such a preferable choice for the majority of juveniles. Undeniably, the children commonly obtain the guideline from their parent at a really tender age. Therefore, when the parents are well-trained, they probably set a good role model for their offspring which enables them to refrain from having some illegal mistakes. Furthermore, with family affection in addition to the deep understanding about children’s personality traits, parents are expected to much easier and more persuasive expose to the youngsters’ behavioral problems and immediately improve it that is thought to reach a totally better outcome.
Notwithstanding, in spite of the aforementioned reasons, parents are by no means the sole source of imparting knowledge, educational staff are also required to be well-equipped. Those people are invariably believed to make fundamental changes to the way children treat others in the upcoming times. This is because children may early receive formal schooling from the teacher and thus, their standpoints are progressively shaped through the way that they interact with the teachers. It means in case the lecturers are delicately trained, they may be able to suitably divert children’s mindset.
In conclusion, without a doubt, educating parents may give rise to many favorable benefits when cultivating the children thinking. However, with the given advantages, enhancing the teaching quality of educators also need to be considering.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 594, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to suitably divert children’s mindset. In conclusion, without a doubt, educatin...
^^^
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... educators also need to be considering.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74035087719 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16250345956 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645614035088 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8379622899 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264023684645 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932270626892 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757670328934 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162305532827 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648708946528 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.