Some part of society holds the belief that teaching parents how to raise children is the only one effective measure which could be taken in order to decrease crime rate among youngsters. While better parenting skills can considerably help to remedy this issue, I believe that other actions such as providing free sport facilities for children could be equally effective.
There is no doubt that educating parents, who play the main role in shaping a child's behavior, is essential for safe society, thus special courses should be developed. Such a program could provide information about psychological characteristics of children at different ages. As a result, parents will be able to spot deviations from normal behavior and could help their children to overcome mental problems. In addition, these courses could teach parents how to educate their children what should be considered favorable or poor. Recent research has revealed that strong moral principles and deep understanding of positive and negative actions help youngsters to avoid involvement in criminal activity.
However, in my opinion, parenting courses is not the only way to solve the rising crime rate of young criminals. Due to the fast paced life parents are lacking free time and pay low attention to their children. As a result, young individuals are spending their leisure time on the streets, where they interact with peers or even adult offenders, who are ruling the street life. In contrast, if youngsters spent time, for example, doing sports they would avoid such a negative surrounding. Nevertheless, children from poor families are limited in the ability to be involved in sport activities, because their parents could not afford to pay for it, thus, I believe the government should provide sport facilities and equipment for free.
In conclusion, even though improving parenting skills is an effective measure to decrease crime rate of young offenders, free sport facilities provided to youngsters could also solve this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33018867925 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75145013206 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.159320251 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.384615385 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4615384615 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171629273574 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699661535857 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560504555727 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109169224609 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243474265074 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.